Social Media & Scam Ads: Andrew Forrest's Battle with Meta Over Misleading Crypto Ads. Australian court discontinues charges, US case ongoing.
 |
| Holding Social Media Accountable: Andrew Forrest's Case Against Meta Over Scam Ads. Legal battle continues despite Australian setback. |
New York, USA, April 12, 2024:
Criminal charges against Meta, the company formerly known as Facebook, for publishing misleading cryptocurrency advertisements featuring Australian billionaire Andrew Forrest have been discontinued in a Perth court.
This development comes on Friday amidst a larger battle by Forrest to hold social media giants accountable for fraudulent content on their platforms.
The charges stemmed from Forrest's claim that Meta knowingly allowed advertisements to be published that used his image and name to promote fake cryptocurrency investment schemes.
These ads allegedly targeted vulnerable individuals, including retirees and pensioners, who risked their life savings.
Forrest, known for his outspokenness and philanthropy, launched a two-pronged attack against Meta. In a highly unusual move, he initiated a private criminal prosecution against the social media giant in a Perth magistrates court.
Additionally, he filed a separate civil lawsuit in California in September 2021.
The Perth court case, however, faced a roadblock due to the seriousness of the charges. Australian law dictates that such charges must be heard in a higher court and prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP).
While the CDPP initially accepted the case, they ultimately decided to discontinue the charges. This decision left an alleged victim of the scam disappointed but determined to see Meta held accountable.
The woman, who lost a substantial amount of money in the scam, emphasized the importance of social media reform to prevent similar incidents in the future. She highlighted the potential for a class-action lawsuit against Meta.
Meanwhile, Forrest remains committed to his fight against Meta in the US civil case. This case will determine whether Meta can be held liable for publishing and failing to remove the fraudulent advertisements.
A successful outcome could force Meta to implement stricter measures to prevent the spread of misleading content on its platforms, not just in Australia but globally.
Forrest is a vocal critic of the legal immunity granted to social media companies under US laws dating back to 1996. He believes these laws shield platforms from responsibility for content they publish, posing a significant threat to democracy worldwide.
He has called for these laws to be "fixed" to ensure social media companies take greater accountability for the content disseminated on their platforms.
The discontinuation of the criminal charges in Australia represents a setback for Forrest's efforts.
However, his ongoing civil case in the US and his public pronouncements keep the pressure on Meta and other social media companies to address the issue of fraudulent content.
The case raises critical questions about the responsibility of social media platforms in the fight against online scams.
While these platforms provide valuable tools for communication and connection, they also create fertile ground for malicious actors.
As this case unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the legal system grapples with the evolving challenges of online fraud and the role social media companies play in mitigating them.