Why did an Indian university claim a Chinese robodog as its own at the AI summit, sparking controversy and social media backlash?
![]() |
| At the India AI Impact Summit, a viral claim about a Chinese robodog sparked confusion and criticism, highlighting the challenges of global tech credibility. Image: CH |
Delhi, India – February 20, 2026:
The controversy surrounding Galgotias University at the India AI Impact Summit has raised pressing questions about credibility and communication in global AI showcases. The university drew attention after a professor claimed that a robotic dog, later identified as the Chinese-made Go2 by Unitree Robotics, was developed in-house. The remarks, captured on video, quickly went viral and sparked criticism online.
The university responded by clarifying that it never claimed ownership of the robot. A statement emphasized that the purpose was to teach students AI programming using globally available tools, while the professor, Neha Singh, said her words had been misunderstood. Nevertheless, social media users accused the institution of dishonesty, illustrating how quickly minor communication lapses can escalate in high-profile tech environments.
Practical consequences followed swiftly: reports indicate the university was asked to vacate its stall, and electricity to the booth was cut. The incident also embarrassed summit organizers, especially after the video had been shared on Ashwini Vaishnaw’s official X account before deletion. IT Secretary S Krishnan urged calm, noting that the event should not be overshadowed and underscoring the importance of proper conduct at such global forums.
The India AI Impact Summit, inaugurated by Narendra Modi, aims to position India as a global AI hub. Delegates from over 100 countries, including leaders like Sundar Pichai, are participating in policy discussions, startup showcases, and closed-door meetings on AI governance. While the opening day faced logistical issues, the summit has since gained momentum, with thousands visiting stalls and engaging with exhibits.
This incident highlights the delicate balance between showcasing innovation and maintaining credibility in the global AI ecosystem. Miscommunication, particularly when amplified by social media, can overshadow genuine progress and affect international perception. For India, a nation aspiring to become an AI leader, the episode serves as a reminder that transparency, accuracy, and careful communication are as critical as technological achievement itself.
